Performance:BoofCV - Revision history

Peter at 02:55, 17 January 2019

2019-01-17T02:55:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:55, 17 January 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:
	** Comparison of BoofCV, OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, JavaSURF, and Pan-o-Matic		** Comparison of BoofCV, OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, JavaSURF, and Pan-o-Matic
	* [[Performance:QrCode\|Study of QR Code Scanning Performance in Different Environments]]		* [[Performance:QrCode\|Study of QR Code Scanning Performance in Different Environments]]
	** BoofCV, Quirc, ZBar, and ZXing		** BoofCV, OpenCV, Quirc, ZBar, and ZXing
	Internal Benchmarks:		Internal Benchmarks:
	* Point Region Descriptors		* Point Region Descriptors

Peter at 18:18, 7 October 2018

2018-10-07T18:18:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 7 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~= Performance of BoofCV =~~

	Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle, see [[Validation:Algorithms\|validation page]]. Inside each package there is a benchmark/directory which contains source code for simple runtime and other simple benchmarks for specific families of algorithms. While in the [https://github.com/lessthanoptimal/BoofCV/tree/master/evaluation/benchmark boofcv/evaluation/benchmark] there are more robust high level tools for comparing algorithms internal and external to BoofCV. Below are two performance studies which compare BoofCV against other popular libraries.		Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle, see [[Validation:Algorithms\|validation page]]. Inside each package there is a benchmark/directory which contains source code for simple runtime and other simple benchmarks for specific families of algorithms. While in the [https://github.com/lessthanoptimal/BoofCV/tree/master/evaluation/benchmark boofcv/evaluation/benchmark] there are more robust high level tools for comparing algorithms internal and external to BoofCV. Below are two performance studies which compare BoofCV against other popular libraries.

Peter at 18:13, 7 October 2018

2018-10-07T18:13:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 7 October 2018
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance: Stability and Speed]]		* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance: Stability and Speed]]
	** Comparison of BoofCV, OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, JavaSURF, and Pan-o-Matic		** Comparison of BoofCV, OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, JavaSURF, and Pan-o-Matic
			* [[Performance:QrCode\|Study of QR Code Scanning Performance in Different Environments]]
			** BoofCV, Quirc, ZBar, and ZXing
	Internal Benchmarks:		Internal Benchmarks:
	* Point Region Descriptors		* Point Region Descriptors

Peter at 03:30, 1 March 2012

2012-03-01T03:30:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:30, 1 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= Performance of BoofCV =		= Performance of BoofCV =

	Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle. Inside each package there is a benchmark/ directory which contains source code for simple runtime and other simple benchmarks for specific families of algorithms. While in the [[https://github.com/lessthanoptimal/BoofCV/tree/master/evaluation/benchmark boofcv/evaluation/benchmark]] there are more robust high level tools for comparing algorithms internal and external to BoofCV. ~~In some cases wiki pages have been created to provide easy access to these results~~.		Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle, see [[Validation:Algorithms\|validation page]]. Inside each package there is a benchmark/directory which contains source code for simple runtime and other simple benchmarks for specific families of algorithms. While in the [https://github.com/lessthanoptimal/BoofCV/tree/master/evaluation/benchmark boofcv/evaluation/benchmark] there are more robust high level tools for comparing algorithms internal and external to BoofCV. Below are two performance studies which compare BoofCV against other popular libraries.

Peter at 04:21, 9 February 2012

2012-02-09T04:21:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:21, 9 February 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV\|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]]		* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV\|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]]
	* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance: Stability and Speed]]		* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance: Stability and Speed]]
	** ~~Compared against~~ OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, JavaSURF, and Pan-o-Matic		** Comparison of BoofCV, OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, JavaSURF, and Pan-o-Matic
	Internal Benchmarks:		Internal Benchmarks:
	* Point Region Descriptors		* Point Region Descriptors

Peter at 18:11, 14 November 2011

2011-11-14T18:11:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 14 November 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV\|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]]		* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV\|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]]
	* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance: Stability and Speed]]		* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance: Stability and Speed]]
	** Compared against OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, and ~~JavaSURF~~		** Compared against OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, JavaSURF, and Pan-o-Matic
	Internal Benchmarks:		Internal Benchmarks:
	* Point Region Descriptors		* Point Region Descriptors

Peter at 17:42, 8 November 2011

2011-11-08T17:42:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 8 November 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Comparison to external libraries:		Comparison to external libraries:
	* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV\|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]]		* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV\|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]]
	* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance]]		* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance: Stability and Speed]]
	** Compared against OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, and JavaSURF		** Compared against OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, and JavaSURF
	Internal Benchmarks:		Internal Benchmarks:
	* Point Region Descriptors		* Point Region Descriptors

Peter at 12:26, 8 November 2011

2011-11-08T12:26:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 8 November 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV\|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]]		* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV\|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]]
	* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance]]		* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance]]
			** Compared against OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, and JavaSURF
	Internal Benchmarks:		Internal Benchmarks:
	* Point Region Descriptors		* Point Region Descriptors

Peter at 19:43, 1 November 2011

2011-11-01T19:43:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 1 November 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Comparison to external libraries:		Comparison to external libraries:
	* Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV		* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV\|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]]
	* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance]]		* [[Performance:SURF\|SURF Performance]]

	Internal Benchmarks:		Internal Benchmarks:
	* Point Region Descriptors		* Point Region Descriptors

Peter: Created page with "= Performance of BoofCV = Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle. Inside each package there is a benchmark/ directory which contains sourc..."

2011-10-25T14:56:56Z

Created page with "= Performance of BoofCV = Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle. Inside each package there is a benchmark/ directory which contains sourc..."

New page

= Performance of BoofCV =

Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle. Inside each package there is a benchmark/ directory which contains source code for simple runtime and other simple benchmarks for specific families of algorithms. While in the [[https://github.com/lessthanoptimal/BoofCV/tree/master/evaluation/benchmark boofcv/evaluation/benchmark]] there are more robust high level tools for comparing algorithms internal and external to BoofCV. In some cases wiki pages have been created to provide easy access to these results.

Comparison to external libraries:
* Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV
* [[Performance:SURF|SURF Performance]]

Internal Benchmarks:
* Point Region Descriptors