Difference between revisions of "Performance:BoofCV"
From BoofCV
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
m |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle, see [[Validation:Algorithms|validation page]]. Inside each package there is a benchmark/directory which contains source code for simple runtime and other simple benchmarks for specific families of algorithms. While in the [https://github.com/lessthanoptimal/BoofCV/tree/master/evaluation/benchmark boofcv/evaluation/benchmark] there are more robust high level tools for comparing algorithms internal and external to BoofCV. Below are two performance studies which compare BoofCV against other popular libraries. | |||
Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle. Inside each package there is a benchmark/ directory which contains source code for simple runtime and other simple benchmarks for specific families of algorithms. While in the | |||
| Line 7: | Line 5: | ||
* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]] | * [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]] | ||
* [[Performance:SURF|SURF Performance: Stability and Speed]] | * [[Performance:SURF|SURF Performance: Stability and Speed]] | ||
** | ** Comparison of BoofCV, OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, JavaSURF, and Pan-o-Matic | ||
* [[Performance:QrCode|Study of QR Code Scanning Performance in Different Environments]] | |||
** BoofCV, OpenCV, Quirc, ZBar, and ZXing | |||
Internal Benchmarks: | Internal Benchmarks: | ||
* Point Region Descriptors | * Point Region Descriptors | ||
Latest revision as of 18:55, 16 January 2019
Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle, see validation page. Inside each package there is a benchmark/directory which contains source code for simple runtime and other simple benchmarks for specific families of algorithms. While in the boofcv/evaluation/benchmark there are more robust high level tools for comparing algorithms internal and external to BoofCV. Below are two performance studies which compare BoofCV against other popular libraries.
Comparison to external libraries:
- Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV
- SURF Performance: Stability and Speed
- Comparison of BoofCV, OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, JavaSURF, and Pan-o-Matic
- Study of QR Code Scanning Performance in Different Environments
- BoofCV, OpenCV, Quirc, ZBar, and ZXing
Internal Benchmarks:
- Point Region Descriptors
