Difference between revisions of "Performance:BoofCV"
From BoofCV
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Comparison to external libraries: | Comparison to external libraries: | ||
* [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]] | * [[Performance:OpenCV:BoofCV|Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV]] | ||
* [[Performance:SURF|SURF Performance]] | * [[Performance:SURF|SURF Performance: Stability and Speed]] | ||
** Compared against OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, and JavaSURF | ** Compared against OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, and JavaSURF | ||
Internal Benchmarks: | Internal Benchmarks: | ||
* Point Region Descriptors | * Point Region Descriptors | ||
Revision as of 09:42, 8 November 2011
Performance of BoofCV
Constant evaluation of BoofCV's performance is part of its development cycle. Inside each package there is a benchmark/ directory which contains source code for simple runtime and other simple benchmarks for specific families of algorithms. While in the [boofcv/evaluation/benchmark] there are more robust high level tools for comparing algorithms internal and external to BoofCV. In some cases wiki pages have been created to provide easy access to these results.
Comparison to external libraries:
- Image Processing Speed: BoofCV vs. OpenCV
- SURF Performance: Stability and Speed
- Compared against OpenSURF, OpenCV, Reference SURF, JOpenSURF, and JavaSURF
Internal Benchmarks:
- Point Region Descriptors
